Topic summary
50% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,060 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Louisiana results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 1,099 hits . Analysis detected 9,637 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,597 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (9,992 of 15,448 topics). This Louisiana is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group. Louisiana
Topic details
Total words: 9,597
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst