Topic summary
⁠50%4 analyzed articles/videos6,061 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Literary Analysis results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 2,850 hits. Analysis detected 21,844 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,041 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (11,950 of 16,245 topics). This Literary Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
Literary Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 22,041
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510026.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles22K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.9%12.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos