Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 956 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Godfrey results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 296 hits . Analysis detected 2,184 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,728 of 6,628 authors). This Lisa Godfrey is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group. Lisa Godfrey
Author details
Total words: 2,868
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst