Topic summary
77% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,778 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal Action results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 1,614 hits . Analysis detected 13,496 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,300 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,160 of 15,747 topics). This Legal Action is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group. Legal Action
Topic details
Total words: 9,300
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.5% percentile 3.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.1% 13.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst