Topic summary
74% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,551 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lake Powell results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Pessimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 3,032 hits . Analysis detected 15,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,853 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (9,203 of 15,144 topics). This Lake Powell is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group. Lake Powell
Topic details
Total words: 13,853
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.1% 15.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst