Author summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 1,332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Greenwood results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Indoctrination , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 596 hits . Analysis detected 2,829 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,606 of 6,289 authors). This Amanda Greenwood is better (less manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group. Amanda Greenwood
Author details
Total words: 3,996
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.9% 14.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Special Pleading: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst