Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,053 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heather Sackett (Aspen Journalism) results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Pessimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 50.4% saturation with 1,061 hits . Analysis detected 3,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,106 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of 93% (514 of 6,628 authors). This Heather Sackett (Aspen Journalism) is worse (more manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group. Heather Sackett (Aspen Journalism)
Author details
Total words: 2,106
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.3% percentile 8.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 50.4% 50.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 17.4% 17.4% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.1% 21.1% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.0% 11.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Author 50.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 21.1%, sitewide 26.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 17.4%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 6.9% Loss Aversion: Author 10.7%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Gambler’s Fallacy: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst