Topic summary
⁠52%5 analyzed articles/videos3,493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor Market Trends results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 1,320 hits. Analysis detected 11,898 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,902 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (10,911 of 15,757 topics). This Labor Market Trends is better (less manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Labor Market Trends
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 4.7%4.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos