Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,088 analyzed words
BS Summary: These La Nina results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.5% saturation with 1,483 hits. Analysis detected 7,579 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,259 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,375 of 16,266 topics). This La Nina is worse (more manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group.
La Nina
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,259
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510091.6% percentile
9.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 45.5%45.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 29.3%29.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 17.5%17.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 24.1%24.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.5%12.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 11.7%11.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 45.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 29.5%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Gambler’s Fallacy: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos