Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Stephens results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 38% saturation with 847 hits . Analysis detected 6,658 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,227 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 12% and a BS Rank of 97% (243 of 6,271 authors). This Olivia Stephens is worse (more manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group. Olivia Stephens
Author details
Total words: 2,227
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.1% percentile 12.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 38.0% 38.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 25.6% 25.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 30.4% 30.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 21.6% 21.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 20.2% 20.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 37.9% 37.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 28.7% 28.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.5% 14.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 15.5% 15.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Author 38.0%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Author 37.9%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 30.4%, sitewide 9.1% Negativity Bias: Author 28.7%, sitewide 19.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 25.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 21.6%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 20.9%, sitewide 15.9% Recency Bias: Author 20.2%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 15.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst