Topic summary
31% 8 analyzed articles/videos 2,472 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Appointments results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 2,413 hits . Analysis detected 19,478 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,473 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,513 of 15,988 topics). This Judicial Appointments is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group. Judicial Appointments
Topic details
Total words: 18,473
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score8 analyzed articles18.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst