KUER0%

Senate confirms 2 new Utah Supreme Court justices, dismissing experience arguments 6%

By Martha Harris0%

6/17/2026, 11:55:16 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Begging the Question, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 430 faulty-reasoning hits from 746 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22.1% and a BS Rank of 6% (19,247 of 20,383 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the article peer group.

The Utah Senate has confirmed two new Utah Supreme Court justices. 
The additions of Jay Jorgensen and Stephen Dent are in response to the Legislature’s expansion of the court from five to seven seats. 
Democrats questioned whether Jorgensen meets the constitutional residency requirements for being on the state’s highest court, which says justices must be “Utah residents for five years preceding selection.” 
The former corporate attorney, who is now general counsel for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, grew up in Utah and received his education at Brigham Young University, but worked mainly outside of Utah from about 1999 to 2020 
Jorgensen moved back to Utah from Korea in December 2020. 
He then served a church mission in Chile from 2022 to 2025. 
“We always intended to return, as evidenced by all the things we talked about,” Jorgensen said during his confirmation hearing before a Senate Committee. 
He believes he was still a Utah resident while temporarily away for religious service. 
Under oath, Jorgensen said he believes he meets the requirement. 
Senate Republicans agreed, some dismissing the residency concerns as partisan. 
In defense of Jorgensen, Republican Sen. 
Brady Brammer said, “you can take the boy out of Utah, but you can't take Utah out of the boy.” 
And Majority Leader Kirk Cullimore said that the residency question has been looked into by the nominating commission, the governor’s office and the Senate Judicial Confirmation Commission. 
“We all feel comfortable that the constitutional requirements have been met,” Cullimore said. 
Sen. 
Emily Buss of the Forward Party said when voting ‘no’ to Jorgensen’s appointment that taxpayers would foot the bill if the residency question is brought to court. 
Democratic Sen. 
Stephanie Pitcher said the minority caucus asked their legal team about this, and said the response they got was, “it’s not possible to predict how a court would rule. 
Staff did state that it would be helpful to know whether the appointee has held a Utah driver's license, filed his income taxes, or was registered to vote in Utah during the last five years.” 
Some Democrats voted ‘no’ on both Dent and Jorgensen because neither attorney has been a judge before. 
There have been Utah and U.S. 
Supreme Court justices throughout history who were also first-time judges. 
Additionally, Sens. 
Karen Kwan and Jen Plumb said they weren’t as impressed as they wanted to be by Dent’s answers and experiences. 
Brammer said the Utah Constitution doesn’t require judicial experience. 
To colleagues, he said he hopes “we can measure these people for what they do bring, as opposed to a made-up qualification that is helpful but not essential to this job.” 
Co-Equal Utah, a nonpartisan group led by attorneys that say they’re focused on protecting the judiciary from political interference, has also expressed concerns about the lack of experience. 
Dent is currently a federal prosecutor in southern Utah. 
Both Dent and Jorgensen repeatedly said that their judicial philosophies are “originalism” and “textualism,” which are especially popular in conservative legal circles and match Cox’s stated judicial philosophy. 
Jorgensen defined both approaches as respecting the intent of those who wrote the Constitution and wrote laws. 
After being confirmed, Jorgensen told lawmakers, “I'm going to read the words that you wrote.” 
When asked, both new justices said in their confirmation hearings that there is a difference between those philosophies and conservatism. 
The latter, Dent said, is a political view focused on outcomes, while originalism and textualism interpret the words of the law without regard for outcome. 
There will be more changes to the Utah Supreme Court in the coming months. 
In addition to the Legislature’s expansion, Justice Diana Hagen resigned earlier this year as Republican lawmakers looked to investigate her for allegations that the Judicial Conduct Commission had already dismissed. 
And Chief Justice Matthew Durrant will retire at the end of August. 
That means Gov. 
Cox has two more justices to appoint. 
After that happens, all but one of the seven justices on the state’s highest court will have been appointed by Cox. 
Jorgensen and Dent are expected to start within the next month, depending on how much time they need to wrap up their current jobs, according to a court spokesperson. 
Physical construction of the Utah Supreme Court chambers is underway to accommodate the two new justices. 
A court spokesperson said it is expected to be complete in September, which is when the court usually starts to hear oral arguments. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.9%Martha Harris: 2.7%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.6%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Martha Harris: 3.6%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic2.8%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.7%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.0%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Martha Harris: 2.0%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias1.7%This article: 11.1%Martha Harris: 5.8%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect11.1%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.8%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.9%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 2.7%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 2.4%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Martha Harris: 5.9%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.4%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.2%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Martha Harris: 1.5%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.5%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.7%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.3%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.5%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.3%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.3%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Martha Harris: 0.9%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem1.3%This article: 4.2%Martha Harris: 0.8%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man4.2%This article: 3.6%Martha Harris: 3.9%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority3.6%This article: 3.4%Martha Harris: 1.2%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma3.4%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.2%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 3.2%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning3.2%This article: 1.3%Martha Harris: 3.5%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization1.3%This article: 2.7%Martha Harris: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring2.7%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.2%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.3%Martha Harris: 5.6%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion6.3%This article: 5.0%Martha Harris: 1.0%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question5.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.6%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.4%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.5%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.6%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.4%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.0%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.9%KUER: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 2.1%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.1%KUER: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.6%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.6%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

746 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers44%attributed speech416writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJay Jorgensen • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJay Jorgensen • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageBrady Brammer • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKirk Cullimore • 27 words • 0.0% coverageKirk Cullimore • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Buss • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageStephanie Pitcher • 29 words • 0.0% coverageStephanie Pitcher • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageKaren Kwan, Jen Plumb • 20 words • 0.0% coverageBrady Brammer • 9 words • 0.0% coverageBrady Brammer • 31 words • 0.0% coverageCo-Equal Utah • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageJay Jorgensen • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJay Jorgensen • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageStephen Dent • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Brady Brammer

85%flagged-word coverage
60 attributed words18% of attributed speech40% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.