Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Supreme Court results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 313 hits. Analysis detected 2,003 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,717 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (13,183 of 15,342 topics). This Utah Supreme Court is better (less manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group.
Utah Supreme Court
Topic details
Total words: 3,717
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510014.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos