KUER0%

Utah Supreme Court Justice Matthew Durant announces his retirement 

By Martha Harris0%

5/22/2026, 1:42:58 PM

BS Summary: The article has not yet been analyzed.

Justice Matthew Durrant, the longest-serving chief justice of the Utah Supreme Court in state history, will retire at the end of the summer. 
That, combined with Justice Diana Hagen’s resignation and the Legislature’s two-seat expansion of the state’s highest court, means there will now be four vacancies out of seven on the court in 2026  a dramatic turnover at a tumultuous time. 
The 69-year-old Durrant spent 26 years on the court, 14 as chief justice. 
“Serving the people of Utah and working alongside dedicated judges and court employees across the state has been the honor of a lifetime,” Chief Justice Durrant said in a statement. 
“I am deeply grateful for the opportunity to help strengthen the administration of justice in Utah.” 
Gov. 
Spencer Cox commended Durrant, calling him a “deeply respected jurist, consummate public servant, and genuinely extraordinary person.” 
“His integrity, humility, and devotion to public service have left a lasting mark on our state, and Utah is better because he chose to serve,” Cox’s statement continued. 
The Utah State Bar had similar sentiments. 
They heralded Durrant’s impact on the judiciary, saying “few judges leave a mark on a state’s legal system” the way he has. 
“He understood that the courthouse must be a place where ordinary people feel the law is working for them, not just a forum for those who can afford to navigate it.” 
The organization also spoke highly of how Durrant carried himself, his respect for the law and the reforms the courts pursued under his leadership. 
“What he built here, in the culture of the courts, in the careers he shaped, in the decisions that now anchor our jurisprudence, will not fade,” the bar said. 
“Utah was fortunate to have him.” 
First appointed to the Utah Supreme Court in 2000 by former Gov. 
Michael Leavitt, Durrant previously served as a judge in Utah’s Third District Court. 
He received his law degree from Harvard Law School after earning his undergraduate degree from Brigham Young University. 
A commission will create a pool of nominees for the governor to pick from, and his choice will be confirmed by the state Senate. 
The governor is already reviewing a list of nominees for the two vacancies created by the Legislature’s expansion of the court. 
All of the finalists are men. 
Lawmakers expanded the court from five to seven justices. 
It’s been a time of change for the Utah Supreme Court. 
Cox appointed Judge John Nielsen to the bench late last year after the retirement of Justice John Pearce. 
Once the four vacancies are filled, that means all but two of the justices on the court will be Cox picks who have been on the job for less than a year. 
Of the remaining justices, Paige Petersen was chosen by former Gov. 
Gary Herbert, and Jill Pohlman was appointed by Cox. 
Justice Hagen suddenly departed after pressure from Republican state leaders, including Cox, who called for an investigation into allegations that she had an inappropriate relationship with an attorney involved in Utah’s contentious redistricting battle. 
That was after the Judicial Conduct Commission investigated the allegations, and the complaint was dismissed. 
Not only will Cox appoint the new justices, but he will also select the new chief justice. 
A law passed by the Legislature last year gave that power to the governor. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 2.7%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Martha Harris: 0.6%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 3.6%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 1.1%Martha Harris: 0.7%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic1.1%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.0%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 2.0%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 17.7%Martha Harris: 5.8%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect17.7%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.8%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.9%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.2%Martha Harris: 2.7%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 2.4%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 18.8%Martha Harris: 5.9%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias18.8%This article: 7.9%Martha Harris: 1.4%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias7.9%This article: 6.1%Martha Harris: 1.2%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error6.1%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.5%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.5%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 26.6%Martha Harris: 1.7%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect26.6%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.3%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.4%Martha Harris: 1.5%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias8.4%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.3%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.3%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.9%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.8%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.7%Martha Harris: 3.9%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority17.7%This article: 11.3%Martha Harris: 1.2%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma11.3%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.2%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.9%Martha Harris: 3.5%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization3.9%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.2%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.0%Martha Harris: 5.6%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion3.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.0%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 21.4%Martha Harris: 1.6%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)21.4%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.4%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.5%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.1%Martha Harris: 0.6%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.1%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.4%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.9%Martha Harris: 1.0%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote7.9%This article: 5.4%Martha Harris: 0.9%KUER: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection5.4%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 2.1%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.1%KUER: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.6%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.6%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

560 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers40%attributed speech335writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageChief Justice Durrant • 30 words • 100.0% coverageChief Justice Durrant • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Cox • 17 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Cox • 28 words • 100.0% coverageUtah State Bar • 7 words • 0.0% coverageUtah State Bar • 22 words • 0.0% coverageUtah State Bar • 31 words • 0.0% coverageUtah State Bar • 24 words • 0.0% coverageUtah State Bar • 29 words • 0.0% coverageUtah State Bar • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageJudicial Conduct Commission • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Spencer Cox

100%flagged-word coverage
45 attributed words20% of attributed speech59% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Unattributed Quote+62.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Spencer Cox: 62.2%62.2%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.