Keyword summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos1,714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Supreme Court results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 942 hits. Analysis detected 8,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,729 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (36,694 of 37,536 keywords). This Utah Supreme Court is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group.
Utah Supreme Court
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
3%Utah Supreme Court (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 14,729
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751002.2% percentile
1.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate