Fox News89%

Utah Supreme Court justice resigns amid probe into alleged relationship with redistricting attorney 19%

By Louis Casiano0%

5/8/2026, 2:54:46 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 854 faulty-reasoning hits from 493 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 33.6% and a BS Rank of 19% (17,897 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 81.80% of the article peer group.

A Utah Supreme Court justice has resigned amid a probe into an alleged relationship with an attorney who worked on a redistricting lawsuit. 
Justice Diana Hagen appeared to reference the investigation and the toll it has taken on her loved ones in a resignation letter to Utah Gov. 
Spencer Cox, which was obtained by Fox News Digital. 
"As a public servant for twenty-six years, I am keenly aware that public service requires sacrifice," Hagen wrote. 
"I have willingly accepted those sacrifices for the privilege of holding a position of public trust, where I could do my part to uphold the rule of law and protect the constitutional rights of every Utahn." 
UTAH LEADERS LAUNCH PROBE INTO SUPREME COURT JUSTICE OVER ALLEGED RELATIONSHIP WITH REDISTRICTING LAWYER 
"I also understand that public officials are rightly held to a higher standard and must accept a greater degree of public scrutiny and diminished privacy," she said. 
"But my family and friends did not choose public life. 
They do not deserve to have intensely personal details surrounding the painful dissolution of my thirty-year marriage subjected to public scrutiny." 
The resignation was effective immediately, a spokesperson for Utah's Administrative Office of the Courts said. 
Hagen was accused by her former husband of sending "inappropriate" text messages to an attorney who helped challenge a Republican-friendly map that maintained four red congressional seats in Utah. 
David Reymann, who worked on behalf of progressive voting rights groups in the case, was named as the lawyer in a complaint that an attorney for Hagen's husband submitted to Chief Justice Matthew Durrant and the Judicial Conduct Commission, according to local outlet KSL. 
RED STATE JUDGE CHOOSES NEW CONGRESSIONAL MAP IN FIGHT THAT COULD RESHAPE HOUSE CONTROL 
Hagen and Reymann previously denied the allegations. 
The Judicial Conduct Commission—described on its website as an independent body comprising several state lawmakers, judges, and members of the public—conducted a preliminary investigation based on the complaint and chose not to pursue the matter further, KSL reported. 
A statement issued by the Utah Supreme Court on behalf of Hagen in April said she took "prompt, prudent, and transparent steps" in response to the allegations by her ex-husband. 
"My last involvement in the redistricting case was October 2024," Hagen said. 
"I voluntarily recused myself from all cases involving Mr. 
Reymann in May 2025, and my recusal was reflected in the Court’s September 15, 2025, opinion in League of Women Voters." 
In her resignation letter, Hagen stated that she would love to continue serving on the bench. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
"But I cannot do so without sacrificing the privacy and well-being of those I care about and the effective functioning and independence of Utah’s judiciary," she wrote. 
Cox will be tasked with naming Hagen's replacement. 
Fox News Digital has reached out to the governor's office. 
Fox News Digital's Ashley Oliver contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 2.3%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Louis Casiano: 3.2%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic5.1%This article: 5.9%Louis Casiano: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic5.9%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 3.0%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.6%Louis Casiano: 10.1%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect14.6%This article: 9.7%Louis Casiano: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion9.7%This article: 7.1%Louis Casiano: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias7.1%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 4.2%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 2.1%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 18.9%Louis Casiano: 10.3%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias18.9%This article: 20.9%Louis Casiano: 5.8%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias20.9%This article: 5.1%Louis Casiano: 1.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error5.1%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 3.3%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Louis Casiano: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias8.9%This article: 6.1%Louis Casiano: 3.6%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect6.1%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Louis Casiano: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 23.5%Louis Casiano: 5.5%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority23.5%This article: 5.5%Louis Casiano: 2.4%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma5.5%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 5.4%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 1.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 22.9%Louis Casiano: 11.0%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion22.9%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 1.9%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.4%Louis Casiano: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof1.4%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.0%Louis Casiano: 1.4%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal2.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.1%Louis Casiano: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.1%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.5%Louis Casiano: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote5.5%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 2.6%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Louis Casiano: 2.3%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Louis Casiano: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.6%

493 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers50%attributed speech248writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDiana Hagen • 18 words • 100.0% coverageDiana Hagen • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDiana Hagen • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDiana Hagen • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDiana Hagen • 21 words • 0.0% coverageUtah's Administrative Office of the Courts • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageUtah Supreme Court • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDiana Hagen • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDiana Hagen • 9 words • 100.0% coverageDiana Hagen • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageDiana Hagen • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageFox News Digital • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAshley Oliver • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Utah Supreme Court

100%flagged-word coverage
30 attributed words12% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%Utah Supreme Court: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.