Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,602 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mitt Romney results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 1,099 hits . Analysis detected 7,127 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,915 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,866 of 37,536 keywords). This Mitt Romney is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group. Mitt Romney
Keyword details
Total words: 5,915
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.1% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst