Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brady Brammer results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Straw Man, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 51.7% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 153 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (10,813 of 26,848 speakers). This Brady Brammer is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Brady Brammer
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.7% percentile
42.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 51.7%51.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 51.7%51.7%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 51.7%51.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 51.7%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 51.7%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Speaker 51.7%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 6.7%Red Herring: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos