Author summary
34% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State House News Service results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 728 hits . Analysis detected 5,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,509 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,442 of 6,628 authors). This State House News Service is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. State House News Service
Author details
Total words: 7,509
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst