WBUR9%

Invasive clams confirmed along northeastern coastline 10%

By Colin A. Young30% State House News Service34%

7/10/2026, 4:54:07 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 454 faulty-reasoning hits from 509 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (19,857 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the article peer group.

Empty Manila clam shells pictured in the intertidal zone at Boston Harbor's Spectacle Island. 
(Courtesy of Aly Putnam via SHNS) 
It all started with reports of "weird clams" around Provincetown in 2023. 
Then a 2025 text message led to a two-pronged investigation that ultimately confirmed the suspicions of researchers: the invasive Manila clam has established itself along the northwestern Atlantic coastline. 
On Tuesday, a team of biologists led by the University of Massachusetts Amherst announced their confirmation, which was part of a report published in Biological Invasions. 
The coastlines of the Northeast states were the "last place in the northern hemisphere to have remained Manila-clam free," UMass said. 
The species was based in a range from Russia's Sakhalin Islands through Japan and southern China before being spread both accidentally and intentionally. 
Though invasive, the researchers said the presence of the Manila clam is not all bad news. 
Besides being "a delicious clam" that has grown into a $7 billion industry, the Manila clam could also take some pressure off native species by providing a new food source for seabirds, crabs and other animals that feed on shellfish. 
"Given that Manila clams are everywhere else in the northern hemisphere, it was only a matter of time before they showed up here, and we’ve been keeping an eye out for them," Aly Putnam, a marine scientist and postdoctoral researcher at UMass Amherst and lecturer at Smith College, said. 
Putnam co-authored the paper on the findings. 
The discovery was the result of a the convergence of two parallel tracks: one that began in 2023 when a group led by the Center for Coastal Studies heard reports from local clammers of "weird clams" in Provincetown and around the Cape; and another that really kicked off when Putnam got a picture of a clam via text from El Fernekees Hartshorn, a recent University of Rhode Island undergraduate who had worked with Putnam before, suggesting it could be a Manila clam. 
Putnam was leading a mini workshop on intertidal biodiversity on Spectacle Island in Boston Harbor at the time and was with Carolina Bastidas, research scientist with MIT Sea Grant. 
The pair decided they would keep an eye out for Manila clams at Spectacle Island and they found their shells "in abundance." 
They later dug at other locations and found live clams, as well as evidence of reproduction. 
An inquiry into the "weird clams" off Provincetown turned up evidence of female Manila clams that had reproduced, too. 
Fernekees Hartshorn and Bastidas were co-authors on the paper. 
"Finding the species is only the beginning. 
Now we are working to understand its distribution, if these populations are expanding and how these clams interact with other species in New England coastal systems. 
This research will help us determine whether this newcomer becomes a minor addition to the ecosystem or a more influential player in the years ahead," Putnam said. 
As New England waters warm, invasive sea squirts move in 
To help fight invasive green crabs, restaurants are putting them on the menu 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 26.1%Colin A. Young: 15.8%Cognoscenti: 2.4%Confirmation Bias26.1%This article: 4.1%Colin A. Young: 3.8%Cognoscenti: 0.5%Anchoring Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.6%Cognoscenti: 2.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 9.6%Colin A. Young: 2.5%Cognoscenti: 0.5%Hindsight Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 4.5%Cognoscenti: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Colin A. Young: 9.5%Cognoscenti: 3.9%Framing Effect11.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.2%Colin A. Young: 4.4%Cognoscenti: 3.4%Optimism Bias13.2%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 1.9%Cognoscenti: 5.0%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 1.9%Cognoscenti: 2.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 1.1%Cognoscenti: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Colin A. Young: 0.5%Cognoscenti: 0.2%Primacy Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 3.9%Cognoscenti: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 2.5%Cognoscenti: 2.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 5.3%Colin A. Young: 3.0%Cognoscenti: 1.7%False Dilemma5.3%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 17.5%Colin A. Young: 9.5%Cognoscenti: 3.5%Hasty Generalization17.5%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 5.0%Cognoscenti: 5.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 2.9%Cognoscenti: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 2.2%Cognoscenti: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 1.9%Cognoscenti: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 6.0%Cognoscenti: 3.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 1.7%Cognoscenti: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 4.4%Cognoscenti: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 1.7%Cognoscenti: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

509 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers26%attributed speech379writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageAly Putnam • 49 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 82 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageAly Putnam • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAly Putnam • 26 words • 0.0% coverageAly Putnam • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Aly Putnam

70%flagged-word coverage
109 attributed words84% of attributed speech53% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.