'Millionaire's tax' supporters say $3.4B haul shows wealthy are staying in Mass. 62%

By Colin A. Young29% State House News Service33%

7/22/2026, 6:45:52 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anchoring Bias, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 35.4% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 909 faulty-reasoning hits from 322 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (8,235 of 21,198 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the article peer group.

Revenue generated from the state surtax on wealthier households was up more than 13% last budget year, totaling more than $3.38 billion, the Department of Revenue reported this week. 
The Raise Up Massachusetts coalition that led the 2022 push to adopt the 4% surtax on household income above about $1.1 million, known as the "millionaire's tax," said fiscal year 2026 was the third year in a row that the surtax generated more than twice DOR's original estimate of $1.2 billion in annual revenue. 
DOR said Monday that it took in precisely $3,380,320,213.11 from the surtax between July 1, 2025 and June 30, 2026. 
The year prior, DOR said it collected $2.987 billion from the surtax. 
"Nearly four years after voters passed the Fair Share Amendment, it's still surpassing expectations. 
The skeptics who said multi-millionaires would flee for other states rather than pay their fair share are being proved wrong; the ultra-rich are clearly staying in Massachusetts and paying more in taxes, leading to the tax’s massive overperformance relative to initial projections," Raise Up said in a statement. 
The revenue generated by the surtax is only supposed to be used for education and transportation initiatives and Raise Up specifically highlighted universal free school meals, free community college and free regional transit buses as ways the surtax is making a difference. 
Last week, Gov. 
Maura Healey proposed using $100 million in "projected" and "unbudgeted" surtax revenue to give public schools an additional $112 in aid per student on average. 
For a third time, lawmakers appear poised to have a sizeable amount of surtax revenue that will be available for them to dole out in a mid-year budget. 
The last two years, lawmakers have divvied up the surtax excess in springtime supplemental spending plans. 
The fiscal year 2026 budget originally expected to use $2.4 billion in surtax revenue, compared to $3.38 billion collected. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 35.4%Colin A. Young: 15.8%Cognoscenti: 2.4%Confirmation Bias35.4%This article: 22.7%Colin A. Young: 3.8%Cognoscenti: 0.4%Anchoring Bias22.7%This article: 5.0%Colin A. Young: 0.6%Cognoscenti: 2.2%Availability Heuristic5.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 4.3%Colin A. Young: 2.5%Cognoscenti: 0.5%Hindsight Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 4.5%Cognoscenti: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 16.8%Colin A. Young: 9.5%Cognoscenti: 3.8%Framing Effect16.8%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Colin A. Young: 4.4%Cognoscenti: 3.3%Optimism Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.9%Colin A. Young: 1.9%Cognoscenti: 4.9%Negativity Bias14.9%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 14.9%Colin A. Young: 1.9%Cognoscenti: 2.0%Halo Effect14.9%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.7%Colin A. Young: 1.1%Cognoscenti: 0.9%Recency Bias8.7%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.5%Cognoscenti: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 14.9%Colin A. Young: 3.9%Cognoscenti: 0.3%Straw Man14.9%This article: 4.3%Colin A. Young: 2.5%Cognoscenti: 2.6%Appeal to Authority4.3%This article: 14.9%Colin A. Young: 3.0%Cognoscenti: 1.6%False Dilemma14.9%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 9.5%Cognoscenti: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.0%Colin A. Young: 5.0%Cognoscenti: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion13.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.7%Colin A. Young: 2.9%Cognoscenti: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.7%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 16.8%Colin A. Young: 2.2%Cognoscenti: 0.4%Burden of Proof16.8%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 14.9%Colin A. Young: 1.9%Cognoscenti: 0.3%Composition/Division14.9%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 31.7%Colin A. Young: 6.0%Cognoscenti: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice31.7%This article: 13.0%Colin A. Young: 1.7%Cognoscenti: 1.3%Indoctrination13.0%This article: 14.9%Colin A. Young: 4.4%Cognoscenti: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias14.9%This article: 0.0%Colin A. Young: 0.0%Cognoscenti: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 13.0%Colin A. Young: 1.7%Cognoscenti: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…13.0%

322 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers71%attributed speech92writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Revenue • 29 words • 0.0% coverageRaise Up Massachusetts coalition • 54 words • 100.0% coverageDepartment of Revenue • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Revenue • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageRaise Up Massachusetts • 48 words • 100.0% coverageRaise Up • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageMaura Healey • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
48 attributed words21% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Raise Up Massachusetts: 100.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Raise Up Massachusetts: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.