Topic summary
85% 10 analyzed articles/videos 6,441 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Islamophobia results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 5,936 hits . Analysis detected 55,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,842 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 48% (8,139 of 15,611 topics). This Islamophobia is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group. Islamophobia
Topic details
Total words: 36,842
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.9% percentile 2.9% BS Score10 analyzed articles36.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst