Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Gurvinder Singh results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 1,332 hits. Analysis detected 7,583 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Gurvinder Singh is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Gurvinder Singh
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Gurvinder Singh (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 7,472
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.1%10.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 17.8%17.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.8%9.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 6.6%6.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.6%9.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 17.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos