5 dead in attack at San Diego mosque; anti-Islamic writings are found, sources say 14%

By Los Angeles Times staff0%

5/18/2026, 10:05:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 1,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,013 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.9% and a BS Rank of 14% (17,611 of 20,445 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 86.10% of the article peer group.

SAN DIEGO  Three people were killed when two suspects opened fire at the Islamic Center of San Diego on Monday morning in an attack that sparked widespread shock and condemnation. 
Police swarmed the center after receiving calls of an active shooter and found a crime scene that expanded across several blocks in the area. 
According to police, officers arrived within four minutes of the first report. 
Authorities said two males, 17 and 19 years old, arrived at the center and opened fire. 
When officers arrived around 11:45 a.m., they found three adults dead in front of the center, San Diego Police Chief Scott Wahl said. 
One of those was the center's security guard, whose actions saved lives, Wahl said. 
As officers searched the center, going door to door looking for a gunman, police received additional calls about gunfire several blocks away. 
About a half-mile south of the center, a landscaper reported being shot at, though he wasn't hit. 
Down another street, officers eventually found the two suspects dead, apparently from self-inflicted gunshot wounds, Wahl said. 
Now, police are trying to determine what led up to the shooting, which is being investigated as a hate crime. 
A law enforcement source not authorized to speak about the ongoing investigation told The Times that investigators found anti-Islamic writings inside the vehicle where the gunmen's bodies were found. 
The official also said investigators have located a suicide note linked to one of the suspects that refers to racial pride, and hate speech was also found inside the vehicle. 
One of the suspects was believed to have used a firearm from their parent's home, the official said. 
The shooting left the community of Clairemont north of downtown San Diego reeling. 
"We have never experienced tragedy like this before," said Taha Hassane, imam of the mosque. 
"It is extremely outrageous to target a place of worship ... 
People come to the Islamic Center to pray, to celebrate, to learn." 
The shooting occurred while a school that operates at the center and mosque was in session. 
The lower-grade classrooms of the K-12 facility are on site at the center, while grades 4 through 12 operate at a separate campus. 
It is the only accredited Islamic school in San Diego, according to the school's website. 
No children were injured in the incident, said Ahmed Shabaik, chairman for the Islamic Center of San Diego, in a brief interview. 
Tazheen Nizam, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations in San Diego, said children and teachers with the school were removed by police and taken to a nearby church. 
“This is obviously very alarming,” said Deana Helmy, the chair of the Islamic Shura Council of Southern California. 
“This is a house of worship. 
There’s a school with children there who are trying to learn, and to go through this is very, very unfortunate.” 
Helmy said the shooting comes at the start of the 12th month of the lunar Muslim calendar, Dhu al-Hijjah, during which many Muslims go on their Hajj pilgrimage and celebrate Eid al-Adha. 
“Having to start the month this way is a little nerve-racking and there is fear,” Helmy said. 
Dozens of families waited on the corner of Hathaway and Petit streets for their children to be released from the school at the mosque and two other schools in the area Monday afternoon. 
Mothers and fathers clutched their elementary-aged children’s hands, kissed their cheeks and tried their best to answer questions about what had unfolded at the mosque  looks of worry and overwhelming sadness etched on their faces. 
Children asked one another if they had heard gunshots. 
Tamer Bar, 39, was waiting to pick up his 7-year-old nephew, who attends school on the second story of the mosque. 
He’d gone to school late that day and had wanted to stay home. 
But his mother told him he had to go. 
“I don't know what's going to happen. 
I'm not going to forgive myself if something happened to him,” Bar recalled his sister telling him. 
Bar has been praying at the mosque at least two times a day since he arrived in the United States from Gaza in 2006. 
He was thankful the shooting hadn’t happened an hour later when the mosque would have been filled with roughly 300 people participating in the Dhuhr prayer. 
Instead, when the shots rang out there were only a few inside and the school children upstairs, he said. 
“It’s a place of peace,” he said of the mosque. 
“When we pray at the mosque we leave everything behind and we go to face God. 
As Muslims, we don’t hate. 
We’re here for peace, which is why we came to the United States.” 
The security guard who was killed is named Amin. 
He'd worked at the mosque for decades and would always greet people by saying “As-salamu alaykum," Bar said, which translates to “peace be upon you." 
Mark Remily, special agent in charge of the FBI's office in San Diego, said the agency was assisting in the investigation. 
"We are actively investigating the things that led up this," Wahl said. 
"Obviously, typically, things like this don't happen on a whim." 
Hussam Ayloush, head of the California chapter of civil rights group the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said that once there are more details available on the motives of the shooting, community leaders will know better how to proceed. 
“Everything is so unknown,” Ayloush said. 
“After we learn a motive, we can determine, was there a security breach, was it hate-motivated? 
Obviously, these things [shootings] are very random, but at this time nobody knows yet.” 
In the meantime, he said his organization is reaching out to mosques across California to ensure they have security protocols in place. 
“We want to communicate without creating unnecessary panic, because at the end of the day we have to live our lives and come to the mosque freely and take our kids to school.” 
Hernandez, Hussain and Winton reported from Los Angeles, Fry from San Diego. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.8%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Los Angeles Times staff: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic7.9%This article: 2.4%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic2.4%This article: 2.6%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias2.6%This article: 1.2%Los Angeles Times staff: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias1.2%This article: 2.6%Los Angeles Times staff: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect2.6%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.8%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.5%Los Angeles Times staff: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias4.5%This article: 5.7%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias5.7%This article: 12.9%Los Angeles Times staff: 2.7%Daily Pilot: 7.8%Negativity Bias12.9%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 1.7%In-Group Bias5.6%This article: 0.5%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.5%This article: 4.8%Los Angeles Times staff: 1.4%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect4.8%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.5%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 5.0%Appeal to Authority11.0%This article: 3.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma3.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 1.6%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning1.6%This article: 2.4%Los Angeles Times staff: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization2.4%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.4%Los Angeles Times staff: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion16.4%This article: 1.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question1.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.6%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Anecdotal3.6%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.8%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground3.8%This article: 2.6%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity2.6%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Los Angeles Times staff: 2.3%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1013 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers51%attributed speech492writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageScott Wahl • 23 words • 0.0% coverageScott Wahl • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageScott Wahl • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageTaha Hassane • 15 words • 0.0% coverageTaha Hassane • 11 words • 0.0% coverageTaha Hassane • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageAhmed Shabaik • 22 words • 0.0% coverageTazheen Nizam • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDeana Helmy • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDeana Helmy • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDeana Helmy • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDeana Helmy • 32 words • 0.0% coverageDeana Helmy • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageTamer Bar • 7 words • 0.0% coverageTamer Bar • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageTamer Bar • 19 words • 0.0% coverageTamer Bar • 10 words • 0.0% coverageTamer Bar • 16 words • 0.0% coverageTamer Bar • 5 words • 0.0% coverageTamer Bar • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageTamer Bar • 25 words • 0.0% coverageMark Remily • 21 words • 0.0% coverageScott Wahl • 12 words • 0.0% coverageScott Wahl • 10 words • 0.0% coverageHussam Ayloush • 38 words • 0.0% coverageHussam Ayloush • 6 words • 0.0% coverageHussam Ayloush • 16 words • 0.0% coverageHussam Ayloush • 14 words • 0.0% coverageHussam Ayloush • 22 words • 0.0% coverageHussam Ayloush • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Hussam Ayloush

83%flagged-word coverage
129 attributed words25% of attributed speech55% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.