Topic summary
90% 25 analyzed articles/videos 17,906 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran US Relations results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 10,033 hits . Analysis detected 79,177 faulty-reasoning hits from 75,980 analyzed words across 25 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (11,938 of 15,447 topics). This Iran US Relations is better (less manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group. Iran US Relations
Topic details
Total words: 75,980
Article count: 25
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score25 analyzed articles76K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.2% 13.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst