Topic summary
78% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,071 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran US Conflict results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 2,191 hits . Analysis detected 20,823 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,164 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,515 of 16,562 topics). This Iran US Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Iran US Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 20,164
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles20.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst