Topic summary
32% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interpersonal Relationships results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 2,081 hits . Analysis detected 14,251 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,760 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (15,445 of 16,562 topics). This Interpersonal Relationships is better (less manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group. Interpersonal Relationships
Topic details
Total words: 21,760
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles21.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst