Topic summary
32%5 analyzed articles/videos2,851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interpersonal Relationships results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 2,081 hits. Analysis detected 14,251 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,760 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (15,445 of 16,562 topics). This Interpersonal Relationships is better (less manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group.
Interpersonal Relationships

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751006.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles21.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate