Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Natalie Kerr Ph.D. results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Actor-Observer Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 222 hits . Analysis detected 1,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Natalie Kerr Ph.D. is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Natalie Kerr Ph.D.
Author details
Total words: 2,796
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Author 7.9% 7.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 0.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst