Topic summary
⁠78%3 analyzed articles/videos4,228 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Criminal Court results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 2,533 hits. Analysis detected 20,149 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,622 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,260 of 15,399 topics). This International Criminal Court is worse (more manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group.
International Criminal Court

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.5%16.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.6%18.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.5%8.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.8%12.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos