Topic summary
48%9 analyzed articles/videos6,157 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Cooperation results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 2,454 hits. Analysis detected 25,696 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,010 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (11,619 of 15,689 topics). This International Cooperation is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
International Cooperation

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score9 analyzed articles25K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.8%9.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate