Fugitive wanted for 2 killings found in Laos after 8 years 2%

By Salvador Hernandez49%

6/12/2026, 11:56:52 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 126 faulty-reasoning hits from 426 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 9.3% and a BS Rank of 2% (21,619 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the article peer group.

An 8-year-old manhunt for a suspect in two California killings came to an end this week after a South Korean national was detained abroad and returned to the United States to face murder charges. 
Myung Jin Kim, 31, was wanted in connection with two killings, including a botched murder-for-hire plot in San Jose in 2016 and the killing of Kim’s friend in the parking lot of a CVS in Westminster two years later. 
Prosecutors filed an arrest warrant for Kim in November 2018, but he is believed to have fled and eluded authorities for eight years. 
“Mr. 
Kim’s cowardly acts of violence finally caught up with him, despite being halfway across the globe,” said Patrick Grandy, assistant director in charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office, in a statement. 
Kim is believed to have hired a hitman for the ambush and killing of a man in San Jose on June 27, 2016. 
Police say the victim was shot in his car after stopping by a residential neighborhood. 
But the investigation by San Jose police determined the hitman had killed the wrong person. 
For years, however, no arrest warrant was issued for Kim. 
Then on Sept. 
5, 2018, Kim was suspected of shooting and killing his friend, 26-year-old Christopher Kim, in the parking lot of a CVS in Westminster after the two argued over money. 
Authorities say Kim allegedly shot his friend six times in front of his girlfriend and then fled on foot. 
On Nov. 20, 2018, police in Orange County issued an arrest warrant for Kim. 
San Jose police continued their investigation into the 2016 killing as well and, on Feb. 3, 2020, an arrest warrant was issued for Kim for allegations of murder, attempted murder and conspiracy to commit murder in the botched murder-for-hire plot. 
Kim eluded law enforcement for years until December 2025 when, according to a statement by the Orange County District Attorney’s Office, Westminster Police Department, FBI, San Jose Police and Santa Clara County District Attorney’s office, he was found living in Laos. 
Kim was taken into custody for alleged immigration violations, including using fraudulent travel documents. 
Orange and Santa Clara county officials worked with the FBI and U.S. marshals to locate and bring Kim back to the states to face felony charges. 
Kim was booked into Anaheim Police Department jail Tuesday, and he was transported to Santa Clara County on Wednesday. 
Federal officials noted Kim was the first person detained and returned to the United States from Laos. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 4.6%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 3.7%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 2.0%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Salvador Hernandez: 6.0%Daily Pilot: 7.8%Negativity Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 4.9%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.6%Salvador Hernandez: 5.1%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority9.6%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.0%Salvador Hernandez: 3.2%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization4.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.7%Salvador Hernandez: 6.1%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion7.7%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 1.8%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 4.3%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 1.4%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.2%Salvador Hernandez: 2.1%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.2%This article: 0.2%Salvador Hernandez: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.2%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

426 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker7.7%attributed speech393writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coveragePatrick Grandy • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Patrick Grandy

100%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words100% of attributed speech15% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Unattributed Quote-0.3 ptsWriter: 0.3%Patrick Grandy: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-0.3 ptsWriter: 0.3%Patrick Grandy: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.