Keyword summary
57% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Killings results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,116 hits . Analysis detected 11,367 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,890 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (20,007 of 36,204 keywords). This Killings is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group. Killings
Keyword details
Total words: 9,890
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.7% percentile 2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst