Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MIKE BALSAMO results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hindsight Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 40.6% saturation with 923 hits . Analysis detected 4,390 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,271 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 91% (654 of 6,628 authors). This MIKE BALSAMO is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group. MIKE BALSAMO
Author details
Total words: 2,271
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.1% percentile 6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 40.6% 40.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 10.7% 10.7% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 21.2% 21.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.4% 8.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Author 5.3% 5.3% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Author 40.6%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 21.2%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.1%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 8.2%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.1% Red Herring: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst