Speaker summary
⁠53%2 analyzed articles/videos76.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Grandy results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50.4% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 235.22 faulty-reasoning hits from 76.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 30.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,620 of 28,364 speakers). This Patrick Grandy is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Patrick Grandy
Speaker details
Total words: 76.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510048.5% percentile
30.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos76.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.8%50.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.4%50.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.9%25.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 38.0%38.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 50.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 38.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos