Topic summary
⁠7%4 analyzed articles/videos1,884 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fugitive Apprehension results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 815 hits. Analysis detected 6,051 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,158 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,985 of 16,559 topics). This Fugitive Apprehension is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Fugitive Apprehension
Topic details
Total words: 8,158
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos