BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.5% saturation with 317 hits. Analysis detected 2,613 faulty-reasoning hits from 802 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.9% and a BS Rank of 47% (11,245 of 21,197 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the article peer group.

Law enforcement has arrested 224 fugitives in Missouri and Illinois since June 1 during Operation Patriot Shield. 
The mission located three missing children and removed hundreds of people wanted for felonies before the nation’s 250th birthday. 
Sixteen of those arrested in Illinois and six in Missouri have been linked to gangs. 
About 31 percent of those warrants were for narcotics charges, 28 percent for weapons offenses, and at least 20 percent for violent crimes including homicide. 
Deputy U.S. 
Marshals also seized fentanyl, heroin, methamphetamines, marijuana and 32 firearms. 
“This work highlights the mission and accomplishments of the men and women of the United States Marshals Service and the great work in conjunction with our state and local partners through our Task Force Officer Program,” said U.S. 
Marshal Steven Lewis of the Eastern District of Missouri. 
“While our deputies are on the streets daily serving high-risk warrants and taking truly dangerous criminals off the streets, the ability to perform operations such as Patriot Shield show the tenacity and capabilities of the United States Marshals Service. 
We are proud to contribute to a safer America. 
Since June 3, the U.S. 
Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Missouri has indicted 35 people for violent crimes, drug crimes and/or gun crimes. 
Most are alleged to have been found with drugs, guns, or both during the investigation, and some are felons previously convicted of violent crimes. 
“Operation Patriot Shield represented an intensive effort by the U.S. 
Marshals Service in the apprehension of the most violent offenders in the St. 
Louis Metro Area and the Southern District of Illinois,” said Southern District of Illinois U.S. 
Marshal David C. 
Davis. 
“The task force concentrated on arresting the most egregious defendants who were wanted for homicide, drug offenses, weapons offenses, and other violent crimes. 
The USMS was successful in this operation because of our dedicated task force partners who participated in this operation, and we are appreciative for their enduring support. 
We believe it is essential that U.S. 
Marshals Service continue to combine the efforts of federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies to locate and apprehend the most dangerous fugitives to reduce violent crime in our communities.” 
In June, the U.S. 
Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Illinois indicted 11 defendants for violent crimes, including crimes involving firearms, assault, drugs, and child sexual exploitation. 
“Our goal with Operation Patriot Shield is to try to head off the typical summer surge in violent crime,” said U.S. 
Attorney Thomas C. 
Albus of the Eastern District of Missouri. 
“The U.S. 
Marshals Service arrested fugitives with active warrants in state and federal court involving crimes ranging from criminal sexual assault to drug trafficking to murder. 
These are folks who have been actively evading capture, some through the use of an alias and others by fleeing the jurisdiction where they were charged. 
We have also sought and obtained federal indictments against nearly three dozen people during that period.” 
Some are also part of the Homeland Security Task Force (HSTF) initiative established by Executive Order 14159, Protecting the American People Against Invasion. 
The HSTF is a whole-of-government partnership dedicated to eliminating criminal cartels, foreign gangs, transnational criminal organizations, and human smuggling and trafficking rings operating in the United States and abroad. 
T 
“Operation Patriot Shield is about more than arrests. 
It is about reclaiming safe communities  freedom from killers, shooters, sex offenders, and drug dealers  so Americans can enjoy the way of life envisioned by our Founders as we celebrate the blessings of liberty on America’s 250th anniversary,” said Southern Illinois U.S. 
Attorney Steven D. 
Weinhoeft. 
Through historic interagency collaboration, the HSTF directs the full might of United States law enforcement towards identifying, investigating, and prosecuting the full spectrum of crimes committed by these organizations, which have long fueled violence and instability within our borders. 
In performing this work, the HSTF places special emphasis on investigating and prosecuting those engaged in child trafficking or other crimes involving children. 
The HSTF further utilizes all available tools to prosecute and remove the most violent criminal aliens from the United States. 
HSTF St. 
Louis comprises agents and officers from the U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE); Homeland Security Investigations (HSI); Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF); United States Marshal Service (USMS); Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA); Internal Revenue Service (IRS); and United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS), with the prosecution being led by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Missouri. 
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? 
Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.9%Scott McClallen: 2.3%Townhall: 5.3%Confirmation Bias0.9%This article: 3.1%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 0.7%Anchoring Bias3.1%This article: 5.9%Scott McClallen: 1.5%Townhall: 2.8%Availability Heuristic5.9%This article: 1.9%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic1.9%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.4%Townhall: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.3%Townhall: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Scott McClallen: 7.4%Townhall: 11.3%Framing Effect8.5%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.3%Townhall: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.7%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 0.3%Status Quo Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.2%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 1.5%Optimism Bias3.2%This article: 6.4%Scott McClallen: 0.9%Townhall: 1.9%Pessimism Bias6.4%This article: 39.5%Scott McClallen: 8.4%Townhall: 13.5%Negativity Bias39.5%This article: 10.8%Scott McClallen: 1.9%Townhall: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias10.8%This article: 6.2%Scott McClallen: 0.9%Townhall: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error6.2%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Scott McClallen: 2.9%Townhall: 4.6%In-Group Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 3.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 29.3%Scott McClallen: 1.5%Townhall: 1.8%Halo Effect29.3%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.0%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 1.3%Recency Bias2.0%This article: 1.2%Scott McClallen: 0.3%Townhall: 0.6%Primacy Effect1.2%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Scott McClallen: 1.6%Townhall: 5.1%Ad Hominem2.1%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.4%Townhall: 2.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 29.4%Scott McClallen: 4.4%Townhall: 4.5%Appeal to Authority29.4%This article: 3.7%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 2.0%False Dilemma3.7%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 1.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 2.2%Townhall: 9.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.6%Townhall: 1.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 29.9%Scott McClallen: 10.3%Townhall: 11.3%Appeal to Emotion29.9%This article: 0.9%Scott McClallen: 1.1%Townhall: 2.3%Begging the Question0.9%This article: 8.2%Scott McClallen: 1.4%Townhall: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.2%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 9.1%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 1.5%Burden of Proof9.1%This article: 5.5%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Appeal to Nature5.5%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.4%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 1.4%Anecdotal2.4%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 38.7%Scott McClallen: 1.8%Townhall: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)38.7%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.2%Scott McClallen: 2.0%Townhall: 3.4%Unattributed Quote1.2%This article: 14.1%Scott McClallen: 3.3%Townhall: 3.0%Quote-first Misdirection14.1%This article: 27.4%Scott McClallen: 5.3%Townhall: 16.2%Biased Writer Voice27.4%This article: 15.3%Scott McClallen: 3.9%Townhall: 5.6%Indoctrination15.3%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Scott McClallen: 5.4%Townhall: 13.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias4.6%This article: 5.5%Scott McClallen: 3.6%Townhall: 5.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.5%

802 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers51%attributed speech395writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageSteven Lewis • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSteven Lewis • 39 words • 100.0% coverageSteven Lewis • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageU.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Missouri • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageDavid C. Davis • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDavid C. Davis • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDavid C. Davis • 3 words • 0.0% coverageDavid C. Davis • 1 words • 0.0% coverageDavid C. Davis • 23 words • 100.0% coverageDavid C. Davis • 27 words • 100.0% coverageDavid C. Davis • 7 words • 100.0% coverageDavid C. Davis • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Illinois • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageThomas C. Albus • 3 words • 0.0% coverageThomas C. Albus • 7 words • 0.0% coverageThomas C. Albus • 2 words • 0.0% coverageThomas C. Albus • 24 words • 0.0% coverageThomas C. Albus • 26 words • 0.0% coverageThomas C. Albus • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageSteven D. Weinhoeft • 8 words • 100.0% coverageSteven D. Weinhoeft • 44 words • 100.0% coverageSteven D. Weinhoeft • 3 words • 0.0% coverageSteven D. Weinhoeft • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSteven D. Weinhoeft • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 59 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageTownhall VIP • 14 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Steven D. Weinhoeft

96%flagged-word coverage
95 attributed words23% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+85.7 ptsWriter: 10.1%Steven D. Weinhoeft: 95.8%95.8%Indoctrination+38.0 ptsWriter: 8.4%Steven D. Weinhoeft: 46.3%46.3%Quote-first Misdirection+28.8 ptsWriter: 17.5%Steven D. Weinhoeft: 46.3%46.3%Politically Right Leaning -9.4 ptsWriter: 9.4%Steven D. Weinhoeft: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.6 ptsWriter: 7.6%Steven D. Weinhoeft: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.5 ptsWriter: 2.5%Steven D. Weinhoeft: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.