Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,682 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Crime results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 660 hits. Analysis detected 5,737 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,728 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (24,822 of 36,925 keywords). This Missouri Crime is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Missouri Crime
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
33%Missouri Crime (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,728
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

33% percentile
025507510032.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos