Speaker summary
58% 1 analyzed article/video 77.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven D. Weinhoeft results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Indoctrination , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 86.4% saturation with 127 hits . Analysis detected 825 faulty-reasoning hits from 77.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 46.8% and a BS Rank of 63% (10,595 of 28,364 speakers). This Steven D. Weinhoeft is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group. Steven D. Weinhoeft
Speaker details
Total words: 77.5
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.6% percentile 46.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos77.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 86.4% 86.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 59.9% 59.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 61.9% 61.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 56.5% 56.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 56.5% 56.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 56.5% 56.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 29.9% 29.9% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 29.9% 29.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 29.9% 29.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 26.5% 26.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 86.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 61.9%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Speaker 59.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 56.5%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Speaker 56.5%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 56.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 40.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 0.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst