Author summary
92% 1 analyzed article/video 1,558 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Hirschel-Burns results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 38.1% saturation with 2,377 hits . Analysis detected 10,801 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,457 of 6,316 authors). This Tim Hirschel-Burns is worse (more manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group. Tim Hirschel-Burns
Author details
Total words: 6,232
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.9% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 38.1% 38.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.0% 17.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 38.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.1%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.7%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Author 7.9%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst