Topic summary
45% 9 analyzed articles/videos 6,492 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Aid results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 3,414 hits . Analysis detected 23,673 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,874 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (13,516 of 16,240 topics). This International Aid is better (less manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group. International Aid
Topic details
Total words: 27,874
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score9 analyzed articles27.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst