Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,668 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tony Frangie-Mawad results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Unattributed Quote , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 1,503 hits . Analysis detected 8,760 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,672 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,046 of 6,628 authors). This Tony Frangie-Mawad is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group. Tony Frangie-Mawad
Author details
Total words: 6,672
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.1% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.8% 17.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 12.2% 12.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 22.5% 22.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 12.2%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst