Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Nick Ferris results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 745 hits . Analysis detected 6,401 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,158 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,332 authors). This Nick Ferris is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Nick Ferris
Author details
Total words: 6,158
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.9% 11.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.1% 12.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.4%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst