Topic summary
74% 10 analyzed articles/videos 2,013 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Injuries results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 2,086 hits . Analysis detected 13,855 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,239 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,424 of 15,689 topics). This Injuries is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group. Injuries
Topic details
Total words: 13,239
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score10 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.8% 15.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst