Author summary
3%3 analyzed articles/videos290 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John R. Ellement results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 173 hits. Analysis detected 698 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,900 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,097 of 6,244 authors). This John R. Ellement is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
John R. Ellement
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
51%John R. Ellement (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,900
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510050.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.5%2.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.8%1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.8%1.8%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Author 1.8%1.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.6%Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos