Topic summary
71% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Influencer Marketing results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 3,244 hits . Analysis detected 28,722 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,307 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,764 of 16,562 topics). This Influencer Marketing is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group. Influencer Marketing
Topic details
Total words: 28,307
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles28.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst