Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,050 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adrian Horton results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 42.9% saturation with 2,640 hits . Analysis detected 12,502 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,150 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,033 of 6,508 authors). This Adrian Horton is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Adrian Horton
Author details
Total words: 6,150
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.1% percentile 5.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 42.9% 42.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 28.6% 28.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 16.3% 16.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.2% 16.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 9.2% 9.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 42.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 28.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 16.3%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 9.2%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Horn Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.0% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst