Topic summary
44% 8 analyzed articles/videos 7,239 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Industrial Policy results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 4,215 hits . Analysis detected 46,143 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,075 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (14,393 of 16,243 topics). This Industrial Policy is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group. Industrial Policy
Topic details
Total words: 53,075
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score8 analyzed articles53.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CSIS 35% 6/30/2026, 12:00:00 PM
CSIS 35% 6/30/2026, 12:00:00 PM