Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Individual Rights results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 2,915 hits. Analysis detected 21,389 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,852 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,747 of 16,562 topics). This Individual Rights is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Individual Rights
Topic details
Total words: 12,852
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.3% percentile
3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.7%21.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 22.7%22.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 13.2%13.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos