Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 989 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Cardoza results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 1,199 hits . Analysis detected 5,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,568 of 6,361 authors). This Jim Cardoza is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group. Jim Cardoza
Author details
Total words: 3,956
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.4% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 30.3% 30.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.7% 4.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.5% 11.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.5% 8.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Author 30.3%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.6%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst