Topic summary
⁠32%2 analyzed articles/videos853 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigrant Experiences results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 761 hits. Analysis detected 3,543 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,188 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (10,923 of 16,243 topics). This Immigrant Experiences is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Immigrant Experiences
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.8% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.7%14.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos